Close Menu
USTaxNews.live – Your Trusted Source for U.S. Tax & Finance Updates
  • Home
  • Audit
  • Finance
  • IRS
  • Legal
  • Tax News
  • Tax preparation
  • Tax Tips
  • USA Accounting
What's Hot

76-Year-Old Stepdad Moved in With Me After Mom Died and I Got Divorced

November 6, 2026

Jobs Report Recap: US Adds Far More Jobs Than Expected

November 6, 2026

Tesla to wind down Cybertruck production in Texas next year

November 6, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated

Subscribe to USTaxNews

* indicates required

Subscribe for Tax Updates

Get the latest IRS news, tax tips, and deadlines delivered to your inbox.

style="display:none">
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
USTaxNews.live – Your Trusted Source for U.S. Tax & Finance Updates
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Home
  • Audit
  • Finance
  • IRS
  • Legal
  • Tax News
  • Tax preparation
  • Tax Tips
  • USA Accounting
USTaxNews.live – Your Trusted Source for U.S. Tax & Finance Updates
Home » IRS proposes to remove look-through rule for REITs
Tax preparation

IRS proposes to remove look-through rule for REITs

EditorBy EditorOctober 27, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link


The Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department are proposing to get rid of the “domestic corporation look-through rule” for determining whether a real estate investment trust in the U.S. is controlled by foreign investors.

The IRS and the Treasury issued a notice of proposed rulemaking last week that would modify the existing regulations for determining whether a REIT is domestically controlled by removing a rule that looks to the shareholders in determining whether foreign investors hold stock directly or indirectly. 

The Treasury and the IRS published proposed regulations in December 2022 setting rules for determining whether the stock of a qualified investment entity is considered “held directly or indirectly” by foreign persons for purposes of defining a domestically controlled QIE. The 2022 proposed regulations defined stock in a QIE that is held “indirectly” by taking into account stock of the QIE held through certain entities under a limited “look-through” approach. Under that approach, only a “non-look-through person” is treated as holding directly or indirectly the stock of a QIE, and the stock of a QIE held by or through one or more intervening “look-through persons” is treated as held proportionately by the look-through person’s ultimate owners who are non-look-through persons.  

The 2022 proposed regulations generally treated a “domestic C corporation,” defined as any domestic corporation other than a RIC, REIT or an S corporation, as a non-look-through person. However, the 2022 proposed regulations treated certain “non-publicly traded domestic C corporations” as look-through persons if the foreign investors held a 25% or greater interest (by value) in the stock of the corporation. This is known as the “domestic corporation look-through rule.” 

In April 2024, the Treasury and the IRS finalized the 2022 proposed regulations, retaining the general approach and structure of the 2022 proposed regulations with some changes. In particular, under the 2024 final regulations the domestic corporation look-through rule applies if foreign persons hold more than a 50% interest (by value) in the stock of the corporation. The 2024 final regs include a transition rule that exempts existing QIEs from the application of the domestic corporation look-through rule for a 10-year period, provided there’s not a significant change in the U.S. real property interests held by the QIE or in the QIE’s ownership.  

After the 2024 final regs were published, the Treasury and the IRS heard feedback from taxpayers recommending the withdrawal of the domestic corporation look-through rule, focusing on the practical difficulty of tracing upstream ownership, often without access to reliable data, resulting in legal uncertainty, operational complexity, and potentially chilling effects on investment in U.S. real estate.  The Treasury and the IRS now say they share these concerns. 

Taxpayers also argued that the domestic corporation look-through rule is inconsistent with the statute and conflicts with congressional intent. They noted that within the domestically controlled QIE provisions, Section 897(h)(4)(B) doesn’t contain explicit corporate look-through rules and that Congress enacted rules in 2015 providing for look-through treatment for certain corporate owners of QIEs, but only in the specific circumstances described in Section 897(h)(4)(E). They argued that the presence of the look-through rules in this section and others indicates that the absence of a similar rule was intentional, and that interpreting them to include corporate look-through rules would render them superfluous.  The recommendations emphasized that the term “indirectly” can have different meanings in the Tax Code aside from the lookthrough treatment of domestic corporations. They further argued that the interests held by a domestic corporation are subject to U.S. corporate income tax and therefore the objective of section 897 is satisfied without looking through a domestic corporation. 

After hearing the feedback, the Treasury and the IRS further considered whether the interpretation of “indirectly” reflected in the domestic corporation look-through rule is consistent with the statutory text and purpose of the DC-QIE exception, which Congress intended to be available for QIEs that are controlled by United States persons.  Upon further consideration, the Treasury and the IRS have taken the view that imposing look-through treatment under the domestic corporation look-through rule with respect to an entity that’s subject to U.S. taxation based on a strict 50% foreign ownership threshold isn’t the right construction that should be given to the text.

Accordingly, the latest set of proposed regulations would remove the domestic corporation look-through rule and treat all domestic C corporations as non-look-through persons in determining whether a QIE is domestically controlled.  The proposed regulations would also provide for various conforming revisions to Section 1.897-1(c)(3) that would now be needed due to the removal of the domestic corporation look-through rule.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Editor
  • Website

Related Posts

Senate Finance Committee proposes to regulate tax preparers, improve IRS administration

February 27, 2026

Tax season ramps up with more client questions, capacity issues

February 27, 2026

Tax Fraud Blotter: Got to know when to hold ’em

February 27, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

News
Finance

Tesla to wind down Cybertruck production in Texas next year

A Tesla Cybertruck at the company’s store in Colma, California, US, on Monday, April 21,…

Automakers face a tougher 2027 as costs rise, market tightens

November 6, 2026

Small retailers brace for ‘huge hit’ as shipping costs spike

November 6, 2026
Top Trending
IRS

IRS CEO Frank Bisignano says mobile app will combat fraud and theft

IRS CEO Frank Bisignano says the agency’s new mobile app will let…

IRS

Chinese national detained, indicted in $360K fake Microsoft tech support scam

Rep. Brett Guthrie, R-Ky., discusses how the United States should handle the…

IRS

IRS raises gas mileage deduction amid price surge

FOX Business correspondent Grady Trimble reports as Millions are traveling for Americas…

Subscribe to News

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading

Welcome to USTaxNews.live – Your Trusted Source for U.S. Tax, Accounting, and Financial News.

At USTaxNews.live, we’re committed to delivering accurate, timely, and practical information on everything related to U.S. taxes, IRS updates, legal issues, accounting practices, and the broader financial landscape. Whether you’re a taxpayer, accountant, legal professional, or business owner, we’re here to help you stay informed and ahead of change.

Our Picks

Mark Zuckerberg threatened to leave California over proposed billionaire tax, Meta says

October 22, 2026

California billionaire tax could leave state with less revenue, Stanford study cautions

October 19, 2026

California’s proposed billionaire tax: How does it add up?

October 18, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2026 ustaxnews. Designed by ustaxnews.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.