A U.S. Postal Service worker loads mail-in ballots onto a truck in 2022 in Miami.
Joe Raedle/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Joe Raedle/Getty Images
A federal judge in Boston has handed the Trump administration another temporary win in the legal fight over the president’s executive order to restrict mail-in voting for the midterm election.
U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani on Wednesday canceled a nationwide ruling she had issued that blocked the U.S. Postal Service from working on Trump’s directives.
The decision sets up another possible consideration of the executive order by the Supreme Court. The court ruled on a procedural issue, but has not weighed in on whether Trump’s order is legal.
In that earlier procedural ruling, the Supreme Court halted a similar June ruling from Talwani that applied only to the 23 mainly Democratic-led states, plus Washington, D.C., that sued over the order.
In response to the executive order Trump signed in March, USPS released a final rule for federal ballot mail. It lays out new design requirements for mail-in ballot envelopes, as well as a plan for delivering mail-in ballots only to people on lists of absentee voters that states would have to turn over to the mailing agency.
It remains unclear, however, if and how Trump’s directives would ultimately affect voting by mail for the midterms, which is set to start in a matter of weeks.
Trump’s order is expected to face more legal hurdles as this lawsuit and other related cases filed by Democrats, voting rights groups and two dozen mainly Democratic-led states proceed.
Edited by Benjamin Swasey
